NB: Sauvage Noble has moved from caelestis.info here to blogspot.com.
Images and other files are off-line and remain to be transferred to different hosts.

sauvage noble

An Austronesian’s Adventures in Altertumswissenschaft and Indogermanistik

14 April 2005

Etyma entomologica eponyma

New species of slime-mold beetles of the genus Agathidium have been given species names after recent or present government officials, among other figures famous from elsewhere (Cornell University News Service, via blogdex):

  • Agathidium bushi Miller and Wheeler
  • Agathidium cheneyi Miller and Wheeler
  • Agathidium rumsfeldi Miller and Wheeler
  • Agathidium vaderi Miller and Wheeler

Honoris causa, of course. Now, the article says:

According to rules established by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, the first word of a new species is its genus; the second word must end in “i” if it’s named after a person; and the final part of the name includes the person or persons who first described the species. That’s why all the new slime-mold beetle species’ names end with [“]Miller and Wheeler[”].

Back in San Diego, 2001, at my scholarly (“squalorly”, quipped my undergraduate advisor) debut, on the same panel was a presentation on the Latinity of the scientific community (I forget the presenter’s name and the talk’s title; the abstract isn’t on line). He surveyed palaeontologists in particular on their knowledge of Latin and whether they cared about the correctness of their names from the linguistic/grammatical point of view. The very few who responded to the survey were reported (1) not to be knowledgeable in Latin as a group, (2) nor to care for correctness. Both owing to the more pressing demands of their discipline.

Nevertheless, preaching to the choir and falling on deaf ears: well, -i is right, but only for second-declension masculines and neuters in -us/um. What of -ius/ium? And what if the eponym were a woman or feminine inanimate? One of the honorands was Pocahontas. Pocahonti? Pocahontasi? Nay, nay, NAY! Surely rather pocahontae? What of the spelling rules? Latinized, Bi-U would be Bushius, but more Latinly Buscius, so the species name would be buscii. Cheney/ius: Ceneius, so ceneii. Rumsfeldius is OK, but hence rumsfeldii. Finally, Vaderius: vaderii. (Vaderiosio anyone? Cf. valesiosio = Valerii on the Lapis Satricanus.)

Yes, yes, -ii often contracted to -i. Still.

3 comments:

  posted at 14/4/05 8:07 PM :

Hrumph. We'll probably have better luck convincing The Daily Show to correct their Latin than palaeontologists.

  posted at 14/4/05 8:14 PM :

UCLA Classics used to get calls from science students writing theses with proposals for species names. So, some try. Maybe not the established researchers so much.

(You know, I wrote TDS, via their feedback form, about our discussion. Let’s see if they respond.)

  posted at 15/4/05 5:41 AM :

So did I! I keep watching TDS every night hoping Jon will say, "You know, we got the weird e-mail..."

Post a Comment